<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DNALC Blogs &#187; Proteins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/tag/proteins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Trying to unlock a new door…..</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/28/trying-to-unlock-a-new-door%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/28/trying-to-unlock-a-new-door%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jermel Watkins]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Genes, Your Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodegeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodegenerative diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ygyh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dnalc.org/?p=4310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is drug development moving along? Well, this is a very good question for we are still plagued by some elusive diseases, cancer for example. There have been many drugs developed targeting proteins involved in disease states some of which have proven to be quite effective. However today the steam engine for identifying drug targets&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/door-wallpaper-13.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/door-wallpaper-13-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4311" /></a>  How is drug development moving along?  Well, this is a very good question for we are still plagued by some elusive diseases, cancer for example.  There have been many drugs developed targeting proteins involved in disease states some of which have proven to be quite effective.  However today the steam engine for identifying drug targets to proteins involved in disease is becoming ever more difficult.<br />
Apparently over the past decade or so, the number of new drugs targeted toward disease has declined.  This is primarily due to the fact that developing new medicine has become more difficult to do.  It turns out that this is partly because we have sifted through all the ideal proteins that can be targeted by a drug.  The remaining proteins are not ideal for developing a targeted drug.  These proteins dawn small cavities or binding pockets and are relatively flat allowing for little to no interaction with a drug target.    Its been said that 15% of proteins can be targeted by drugs.  The percent of proteins that modify disease is 10 to 15 %.  In order to alleviate this problem scientist have acquired the help of computer modeling to more thoroughly identify and test favorable small molecules that can block the activity of these undruggable protein populations related to disease.  Dr. Stockwell an Associate professor at Columbia University, has attempted computer modeling and has come across compounds to target a class of E3 ligases, which are characteristically undruggable, and involved in just about every disease.  Of these compounds one in particularly was a potent inhibitor.  Dr. Stockwell will be publishing his findings in the next few months on the efficacy of the inhibitor.  If it proves worthy this new drug will have an impact on cancer and neurodegenerative disease.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/28/trying-to-unlock-a-new-door%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Size Does Not Fit All</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/11/one-size-does-not-fit-all/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/11/one-size-does-not-fit-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Galasso]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Genes, Your Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adverse Drug Reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacogenomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dnalc.org/?p=4284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1994, there were more than 2.2 million serious medical cases, and over 100,000 deaths from negative reactions to prescribed drugs.  (NCBI)  These numbers have made adverse drug reactions one of the leading causes of hospitalization and deaths in the US.  Currently, there is no easy way to determine how a patient is going to&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1994, there were more than 2.2 million serious medical cases, and over 100,000 deaths from negative reactions to prescribed drugs.  (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/primer/pharm.html">NCBI</a>)  These numbers have made adverse drug reactions one of the leading causes of hospitalization and deaths in the US.  Currently, there is no easy way to determine how a patient is going to respond to a medication, so pharmaceutical companies are relying on a “one size fits all” policy.  But as we can see with the amount of hospitalizations and deaths each year, there has to be a better way.  One area that is shedding hope on this is pharmacogenomics.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/416px-Dna-SNP_svg.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4290" src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/416px-Dna-SNP_svg-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Pharmacogenomics is the ability to study the differences in the DNA of a person to see how they are going to respond to a certain drug.  The DNA contains instructions on how to make proteins.  These proteins then go on to carry out life’s basic functions.  A disorder that may result because of changes in the production of these proteins resulting from mutations in the DNA has been a major area of research for some time.  But now we have to look into how some of these proteins are interacting with the medications that we are taking to treat the disorder.  It is a major shift in the way many people think about DNA and how it affects our health.</p>
<p>Pharmacogenomics is a relatively new area of science that is now looking into these differences in the DNA that cause a person to respond to a drug in a certain way, if at all.  There are a whole group of proteins that are in charge of metabolizing, or breaking down, the medications we take into their active forms.  The instructions in the DNA that make these proteins are different from person to person, so it is these variations that will either make a person make more of the proteins, less, or none at all.  These different levels then cause a person to respond to a drug in a certain way.</p>
<p>For example, if a patient is taking the blood thinner Warfarin to treat blood clots, and they are making too much of the protein that metabolizes this drug, they will break it down too fast and this could possibly thin the blood too much.  If they are a patient that either makes less or none of this protein, the clots will still form, which could still cause serious problems for that patient.  So if we could gather all of the variations in the DNA that lead to certain reactions to drugs, we could use this information to better treat future patients.</p>
<p>A DNA test could be done before the medication is prescribed.  If a patient is showing a similar variation in the DNA to a previous patient that was not able to metabolize a drug, the doctor may want to think twice about prescribing that drug to their patient.  Since we now know that one size does NOT fit all, studying the variations in the DNA to see how their patients will respond to certain drugs will help in prescribing the correct drug and at the right dose.</p>
<p>Featured image from: http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/tag/personalized-medicine/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2011/11/11/one-size-does-not-fit-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
