<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DNALC Blogs &#187; diversity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/tag/diversity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Evolution &#8211; Got Milk?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/02/17/evolution-got-milk/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/02/17/evolution-got-milk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Galasso]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Genes, Your Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lactose intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lactose persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dnalc.org/?p=4560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After asking students during a lesson on mutations if it is possible that a mutation in DNA could be good, most students will nod yes without much understanding.  Recently, I finally had one student raise his hand immediately and answer the question (with extreme surprise that no other students were blurting out the answer)…”evolution!”   He&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After asking students during a lesson on mutations if it is possible that a mutation in DNA could be good, most students will nod yes without much understanding.  Recently, I finally had one student raise his hand immediately and answer the question (with extreme surprise that no other students were blurting out the answer)…”evolution!”   He was able to make the connection between changes in DNA that are building up over time, and how that change can possibly make that organism better in some way.  If it helps the survival of an organism, that mutation is going to stick around and get passed on to its offspring.  Most students still lose the idea that these mutations are random, and depending on the environment that the organism lives in, there will be different pressures that select which is the “best” or “better” trait.</p>
<p>While most students don’t fully grasp this idea, there are a few examples we can use that can help to explain this.  I have always used examples of giraffes and the development of long necks, or antibiotic resistance in bacteria, but these seem to be a bit out of the realm of many 5<sup>th</sup> grade students.  So what better example than ourselves!</p>
<p>During another lesson, I introduced the development of lactase persistence, or having the ability to drink and eat dairy products past infancy.  Digesting the sugar in milk (lactose) is dependent on whether or not the cells of your small intestine are producing the enzyme lactase.  Lactase is responsible for breaking lactose into smaller components that then get absorbed into the bloodstream.  For mammals that get milk from mother early in life, this enzyme is essential.  Would a mutation in the DNA that would allow a cell to continue to make lactase past infancy be beneficial?  It all depends on which population of humans you ask.</p>
<p>If it is a population of humans that began drinking the milk of other animals after the development of agriculture, like those of Northern European descent, it would be selected for.  These populations now show the <a href="http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143820">highest frequency</a> of lactase persistence among all human populations.  If dairy was not a part of your diet after infancy, this mutation wouldn’t be considered beneficial and would not have been selected for, such as in African, Asian and South American populations.</p>
<p>So, when teaching evolution and the changes that we see in species over time, it is nice to be able to give an example that we can see in humans.  Using an example that is a recent development in humans over the last 10,000 years, may help students to understand this concept better, and apply it across any species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/02/17/evolution-got-milk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tag&#8230;You&#8217;re It!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/01/19/tag-youre-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/01/19/tag-youre-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Galasso]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Genes, Your Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epigenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epigenome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identical Twins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inherit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methylation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dnalc.org/?p=4462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classic genetics alone is unable to explain the diversity we see within a population of living things.  This also cannot explain how identical twins with the same DNA sequences can have differences in their traits and development of disease.  First introduced in 1939 by C.H. Waddington, epigenetics is now able to offer some explanation, as&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic genetics alone is unable to explain the diversity we see within a population of living things.  This also cannot explain how identical twins with the same DNA sequences can have differences in their traits and development of disease.  First introduced in 1939 by C.H. Waddington, epigenetics is now able to offer some explanation, as it studies the heritable changes in gene expression that are not due to any alteration in the DNA sequence.</p>
<p>This may help to answer many questions.  How can we have so many different types of cells and they all carry the same genetic information?  How is it possible for one identical twin to develop cancer while the other does not?  Can we use this control of the gene expression to help cells that may have lost their way?</p>
<p>It is amazing to think that just about all of the cells of the human body has the same DNA.  The full genetic profile with all of the instructions on how to make a human is in almost every cell.  When most students come through the DNA Learning Center, many of them think that there is different DNA inside of these cells.  That red blood cells have different DNA than bone cells and nerve cells.  One way this is done is through the interaction of small methyl groups (-CH<sub>3</sub>) that get added to the DNA molecule, which can help to silence a gene that is not needed in some type of cell or at some point of development.  This is a epigenetic “tag” because there is no change to the sequence of DNA, it is just whether or not there is access to the DNA.  The methyl groups that get added make the cell unable to activate that gene.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/300px-Epigenetic_mechanisms.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4463" src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/300px-Epigenetic_mechanisms.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="209" /></a>This addition of methyl groups, called methylation, also can change throughout the course of our life.  So as we get older the interaction of these groups with our DNA can change.  So even with identical twins, who are born with the same DNA, their epigenetic “tags” can vary and occur independent of one another.  And even more, certain lifestyle choices and experiences throughout the life of a person can change the epigenetic profile of an individual.  And then this gets passed on to our children.  So even what a mother eats while pregnant can affect the tags that get passed to their child.  This ultimately will affect the expression of genes in the child.</p>
<p>And now we are using this information to help treat disease, such as cancer.  So if a gene is turned on that shouldn’t be, could we add methyl groups to that section of the DNA to turn it off?  This has started being used as a new therapy for the treatment for certain cancers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2012/01/19/tag-youre-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexual Selection</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/04/01/sexual-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/04/01/sexual-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6.191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we think about all of the living things on Earth, we immediately see how different we all are from each other.  Many of these traits that might seem bizarre to us, evolutionarily speaking, have a tremendous amount to do with the survival.  Many traits have been selected for by the opposite sex, because it&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Widow_bird.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3351" title="Widow_bird" src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Widow_bird-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>When we think about all of the living things on Earth, we immediately see how different we all are from each other.  Many of these traits that might seem bizarre to us, evolutionarily speaking, have a tremendous amount to do with the survival.  Many traits have been selected for by the opposite sex, because it will help the passing on of their design information.</p>
<p>One very amazing example of this is the Widowbirds that live in the grasslands of southern and eastern Africa.  During the non-mating season, the males and females look very similar to one another.  Once breeding season begins, the males molt and produce long black feathers, some that can be up to half a meter in length.  Studies have been done where feathers have been glued on to some males, and females chose these males over others with shorter tails.  You also have to wonder why the tails don’t get even longer.  That even though females desire very long tails, if they get too long, they could hinder the flight of the birds, which would decrease their fitness.</p>
<p>Other examples that might be more familiar to you are the elaborate feathers of male peacocks, and the beautiful plumage of male birds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/04/01/sexual-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
