<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DNALC Blogs &#187; dinosaur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/tag/dinosaur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Could Jurassic Park have been right?:  Venomous Dinos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/01/28/could-jurassic-park-have-been-right-venomous-dinos/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/01/28/could-jurassic-park-have-been-right-venomous-dinos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elna Carrasco]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilophosaurus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sinornithosaurus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6.142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[65 million years ago one of the most amazing and dynamic groups of organisms vanished from our planet, the Dinosaurs. All that remains are fossil records with gaping holes and missing data. Only recently has science began to unveil some of the mysteries of these behemoths. For decades it was believed that ancient DNA, proteins,&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sinorn-art.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3298" title="sinorn-art" src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sinorn-art.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="127" /></a>65 million years ago one of the most amazing and dynamic groups of organisms vanished from our planet, the Dinosaurs. All that remains are fossil records with gaping holes and missing data.</p>
<p>Only recently has science began to unveil some of the mysteries of these behemoths. For decades it was believed that ancient DNA, proteins, and soft tissue could not be preserved over millions of years. Now, during the last 2 years, soft tissue was discovered deep inside the thigh bones of T-Rex.</p>
<p>There are times that inspiration for truth comes from science fiction, such as the best selling novel and blockbuster film, &#8220;Jurassic Park.&#8221; The film took some artistic liberty with their dinosaurian profiles. One of the most noticed was giving a carnivorous dinosaur known as Dilophosaurus a special skill – the ability to spit toxic venom.</p>
<p>According to their fossils, there was no evidence for venom production in this type of dinosaur. In fact to most paleontologists this idea was laughable. Today venomous dinosaurs might not be so funny.</p>
<p>A fossil of a small dinosaur called sinornithosaurus (a chicken-sized dinosaur) was discovered in China about 9 years ago. This species existed in the mid-Jurassic (about 124 million years ago). This find caused a sensation because it had clear evidence of feathering. In 2009 a research team studied the skull of this animal intensively and made an interesting discovery. They found mysterious air pockets located above many of the teeth. These &#8220;pockets&#8221; connected to grooves in the dinosaurs teeth that spanned from the base of the tooth to the tip. This would be the perfect mechanism for a venomous bite. Even though this new theory is controversial, it is a logical explanation.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-146" src="/oldimages/sinorn-skull1.jpg" alt="sinorn skull" width="116" height="91" /></p>
<p>If these little dinosaurs were poisonous, it may be impossible to tell anything about the venom itself. There would be no trace of it left after about 124 million years. The answer lies within their DNA. There is an unbearably slim chance of finding any soft tissue remaining in such a small fossil. This is always the problem for every paleontologist, we just have to take what we can get, and go as far as we can go – and hope for answers along the way.<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-141" src="/oldimages/sinorn-feathered.jpg" alt="sinorn feathered" width="148" height="253" /></p>
<p>For more information on this new discovery go to:<span style="font-size: x-small;"> <span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/51402/title/Groovy_teeth_suggest_dinosaur_was_venomous"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: x-small; color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-size: x-small; color: #0000ff;">http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/51402/title/Groovy_teeth_suggest_dinosaur_was_venomous</span></span></span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2010/01/28/could-jurassic-park-have-been-right-venomous-dinos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chikafrogonewtasaurus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2009/09/04/dino-proteins/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2009/09/04/dino-proteins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elna Carrasco]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrannosaurus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6.9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being an educator at the DNALC does not mean that everything has to be all &#8220;DNA&#8221;!  Sometimes, it’s all about proteins.  My background is in ecology and evolution, with a particular bent towards dinosaurs.  In 2005, dinosaur paleontologists decided to slice the leg bone of a 68 million year old Tyrannosaurus rex, just to see&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Chicken.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3139" title="Chicken" src="http://blogs.dnalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Chicken-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Being an educator at the DNALC does not mean that everything has to be all &#8220;DNA&#8221;!  Sometimes, it’s all about proteins.  My background is in ecology and evolution, with a particular bent towards dinosaurs.  In 2005, dinosaur paleontologists decided to slice the leg bone of a 68 million year old <em>Tyrannosaurus rex,</em> just to see what it looked like inside.  They were in for a surprise.  There were remnants of soft tissue – still present after 68 million years!!</p>
<p>In 2007, they were able to identify and compare seven protein sequences.  Three of these proteins seemed to be closely related to chickens.  Two others resembled frog and newt sequences.</p>
<p>Although tempting to contemplate, this does not indicate that T Rex was really a &#8220;Chikafrogonewtasaurus.&#8221;  This information simply provides us with tools to better understand the relationships between extinct and extant animals.</p>
<p>Who knows, maybe we are getting closer and closer to a new “Jurassic Park” reality show…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.dnalc.org/2009/09/04/dino-proteins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
